A fascinating op-ed appeared in yesterday’s New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/08/opinion/sunday/should-medicine-discard-race.html?emc=edit_th_20171210&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=44005038
The author, Moises Velasquez-Manoff, argues that tying the propensity for certain diseases and health care behaviors primarily to racial identity is problematic. An example is sickle cell anemia, long hailed as a “Black person’s disease.” making exceptions to the rule–i.e., “White” patients with the disease–difficult to explain. The reason for the confusion, as suggested in the article, is that there are far too many unknowns and misconceptions in our broad understanding of race.
Several years ago, I listened to a featured speaker at the Cancer Health Disparities Conference sponsored by the American Association for Cancer Research. He made the argument that beneath just about every claim of health disparity tied to race was an insufficiently-explored inequity of another sort–economics, housing or diet, for example. In effect, the speaker (whose name unfortunately escapes me) proposed that researchers think carefully before focusing on race in medical research and health care rather than the socioeconomic factors that might be more influential on the health of a particular individual or population.
I have to wonder where this argument will lead as more of us investigate our genetic histories and discover that we may not be who we think we are.